Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2019-04-02 13:13:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> FWIW, I see six potential candidates, not two:
> These have an explicit case / separate error for TM_Invisible (= 1 -
> which is the status we're seeing according to the error message)
> though. So afaict they can't be relevant here.
Oh, right, so it has to be from one of the calls in nodeModifyTable.c.
But it's hardly plausible that that runs post-commit. So now I'm
thinking that what we really need to know is why a TM_Invisible
result was returned. That's going to be a bit harder ...
regards, tom lane