Re: Fix number skipping in to_number

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oliver Ford <ojford(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix number skipping in to_number
Date: 2017-11-13 21:56:59
Message-ID: 2120.1510610219@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oliver Ford <ojford(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Monday, 13 November 2017, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I don't follow your concern? If "$" is not the correct currency
>> symbol for the locale, we shouldn't accept it as a match to an L format.
>> Your patch is tightening what we will accept as a match to a G format,
>> so I don't see why you're concerned about backward compatibility in
>> one case but not the other.

> It's a guess as to the likely use case. I would imagine that people are
> likely to use a currency symbol different from the locale, but unlikely to
> use a different group separator. Others might have a different opinion
> though.

Well, if they use a currency symbol different from the locale's, they're
in trouble anyway because the number of bytes might be different. In most
encodings, symbols other than "$" are probably not 1-byte characters.

At the very least I think we need to constrain it enough that it not
swallow a fractional character.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-11-13 22:09:42 Re: Migration to PGLister - After
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-11-13 21:50:41 Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys after initialization