Re: Strange result with LATERAL query

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Strange result with LATERAL query
Date: 2016-08-24 16:15:17
Message-ID: 21144.1472055317@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> How about:

Hm, I was just working on inserting something of the sort into
ExecInitAgg. But I guess we could do it in the planner too.
Will run with your approach.

I think it's a bit too stupid as-is, though. We don't need to
recalculate for Params in aggdirectargs, do we?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-08-24 16:16:13 Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-08-24 16:08:39 Re: Oddity in EXPLAIN for foreign/custom join pushdown plans