| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table |
| Date: | 1999-11-30 16:31:23 |
| Message-ID: | 21141.943979483@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE> writes:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Can anyone else take the time to compare speed of large sorts between
>> 6.5.* and current code?
> I have a few Linux and FreeBSD machines with rather normal hardware I
> could use, but I'm not all that familiar with what you were working on, so
> I'd need exact specifications or, better yet, a script.
Tatsuo posted his sort test script to pgsql-hackers on 02 Nov 1999
13:07:32 +0900; you can get it from the archives.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 1999-11-30 16:44:39 | Re: Portability (was Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-11-30 16:18:49 | Re: Portability (was Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails) |