| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format |
| Date: | 2009-08-10 15:00:42 |
| Message-ID: | 2112.1249916442@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Got you thinking about what? I'd welcome any comments you have.
> I wondered if it should just return char *. If we want to have this
> functionality as its own fmgr-blessed function, shouldn't it return
> text instead of cstring?
If we expose it at fmgr level it should definitely not return cstring.
However, I wasn't foreseeing doing that --- does the submitted patch
expose it?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-08-10 15:17:32 | Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-10 14:58:01 | Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows |