Re: commit_delay and commit_siblings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: commit_delay and commit_siblings
Date: 2005-07-13 19:58:28
Message-ID: 21111.1121284708@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I heard mention from Berkus that these may be going by the wayside. Any
> truth to that?

Tatsuo put up some benchmark numbers showing that they can be of use,
so unless somebody refutes those results, I guess they stay. (I have
doubts about the results myself, but have been too busy with other
stuff to investigate.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2005-07-13 20:12:58 Re: Order by optimisations?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-07-13 19:53:57 checkpoint_segments 32 megs?