Re: BUG #2389: function within function return value

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "James M Doherty" <jim(at)jdoherty(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2389: function within function return value
Date: 2006-04-13 16:51:15
Message-ID: 21088.1144947075@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

"James M Doherty" <jim(at)jdoherty(dot)net> writes:
> The above function is called as follows:
> trec.tot_value :=
> get_glaccttotals(RECORD_DATE,BANKID,''A500000'',''A500299'');
> The result is always null.

It's impossible to do much with this when you have not shown us a
complete test case, but I'm wondering if your calling function is
passing parameter values that don't match anything in the
bank_balance_sheet table. That would cause the sum() to return
null and then total_due would go to null as well.

It's pretty bogus that SQL defines sum() over no rows to return
null rather than zero, but the spec is perfectly clear about it.
You might want to change sum(bbs.bbs_current_balance) to
coalesce(sum(bbs.bbs_current_balance), 0) if you need to deal with
such situations.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-04-13 16:55:41 Re: BUG #2391: "Similar to" pattern matching does not operate as documented
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-04-13 16:43:16 Re: BUG #2390: check constraint