Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
Date: 2004-07-03 15:28:16
Message-ID: 21042.1088868496@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> This seems like a irregularity in the API that makes sense only from an
> implementation point of view.

You are attacking a straw man. This does *not* "make sense from an
implementation point of view" --- it's easier to have just one command
(and in fact that is what is in CVS tip). The proposal to use different
commands was advanced on the grounds that it's a more user-friendly API.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2004-07-03 15:59:17 LinuxTag wrapup
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-07-03 15:10:23 Re: Adding VERSION to startup log output