Re: Long options for pg_ctl waiting

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Long options for pg_ctl waiting
Date: 2016-10-19 12:50:45
Message-ID: 20edbf34-cbd2-50f4-4eea-2904a0888a41@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/3/16 4:57 PM, Vik Fearing wrote:
> One thing that has been irking me ever since I came to PostgreSQL is the
> fact that pg_ctl -w (and -W) don't have longhand equivalents. I like to
> use the long version in scripts and such as extra documentation, and
> I've never been able to with these. What's more, I keep forgetting that
> --wait (and --no-wait) aren't a thing.

committed

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-10-19 12:51:10 Re: Long options for pg_ctl waiting
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2016-10-19 12:47:18 Re: Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age