Re: Integrity and Inheritance

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: Christophe Labouisse <labouiss(at)cybercable(dot)fr>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Integrity and Inheritance
Date: 2001-06-10 16:11:19
Message-ID: 20987.992189479@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> One problem is that for update isn't supported across inheritance trees
> AFAICS and the triggers use for update for the appropriate locking.

It's possible (maybe even likely) that this could be fixed with minimal
work. I punted on it for 7.1 due to lack of time. However, is that
really the major obstacle in the way of inherited foreign keys? Seems
like there are a bunch of issues that'd require cross-table unique
indexes, as well.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry G. Mastrukov 2001-06-10 19:07:08 GRANT EXECUTE
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2001-06-10 05:23:58 Re: Integrity and Inheritance