Re: [PATCH] btree_gist: fix union implementation for variable length columns

From: Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btree_gist: fix union implementation for variable length columns
Date: 2018-11-22 13:23:48
Message-ID: 2098613.cWKOqhXqBE@nb.usersys.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thursday, July 12, 2018 5:53:18 PM CET Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> > It would be easier to figure this out if the btree_gist code weren't
> > so desperately undocumented. Teodor, do you remember why it's like
> > this?
>
> Will look.

Ping on this issue. I guess the patch I proposed isn't wrong in this
case, I'm just not sure about the commit message.

Pavel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-11-22 13:32:36 Re: New function pg_stat_statements_reset_query() to reset statistics of a specific query
Previous Message Evgeniy Efimkin 2018-11-22 13:23:01 Re: [WIP] CREATE SUBSCRIPTION with FOR TABLES clause (table filter)