From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Updating column on row update |
Date: | 2009-11-24 18:34:22 |
Message-ID: | 20970.1259087662@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> But actually I thought we had more or less concluded that CREATE OR
>> REPLACE LANGUAGE would be acceptable (perhaps only if it's given
>> without any extra args?).
> I'm not sure there's any value in that restriction - seems more
> confusing than helpful.
The point would be to reduce the risk that you're changing the language
definition in a surprising way. Extra args would imply that you're
trying to install a non-default definition of the language.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-11-24 18:54:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Updating column on row update |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-11-24 18:26:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Updating column on row update |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-11-24 18:46:19 | Re: garbage in psql -l |
Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2009-11-24 18:32:05 | Re: garbage in psql -l |