Re: Deprecation warnings on Rocky 10.2 with current dev branch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rui Zhao <zhaorui126(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Deprecation warnings on Rocky 10.2 with current dev branch
Date: 2026-10-15 14:32:48
Message-ID: 2096121.1792074768@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> So I'll use 0001 as you have it, but I think while I'm at it
> I will add test coverage for these behaviors.

Pushed. I shall now watch the buildfarm from a safe distance.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message alvherre@kurilemu.de 2026-10-15 14:41:56 Re: Bug in logical decoding with DDL and subtransactions
Previous Message Salma El-Sayed 2026-10-15 14:26:25 Re: PoC: Simplify recovery after dropping a table by LOGGING the restore LSN