Bug in brin_minmax_multi_distance_numeric()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Bug in brin_minmax_multi_distance_numeric()
Date: 2025-07-31 17:33:35
Message-ID: 2093712.1753983215@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Per the discussion in [1], I think we need something like

- PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(DirectFunctionCall1(numeric_float8, d));
+ PG_RETURN_DATUM(DirectFunctionCall1(numeric_float8, d));

in brin_minmax_multi_distance_numeric(). Peter was proposing
that as cosmetic cleanup, but I think it's actually a functional
bug that needs to be back-patched. It is certainly broken on
32-bit machines where the Datum result of numeric_float8 will
be a pointer, so that we will convert the numeric pointer value
to a float and return that, yielding a totally-garbage distance
value. But I think it's broken on 64-bit machines too, because
we'll be interpreting the output of numeric_float8 as a uintptr_t
and applying some unwanted conversion to make that a float.

It's not clear to me exactly what this function is used for,
but I guess the consequences would be broken BRIN indexes
on numeric columns?

regards, tom lane

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2091622.1753982274%40sss.pgh.pa.us

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-07-31 18:22:38 Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-07-31 17:17:54 Re: Datum as struct