Re: [SQL] More efficient DELETE ... ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] More efficient DELETE ... ?
Date: 2000-01-22 18:07:47
Message-ID: 20925.948564467@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> This looks painful ...

> DELETE FROM webhit_referer_raw
> WHERE oid IN ( SELECT w.oid
> FROM webhit_referer_raw w, referrer_data r
> WHERE stat_date < 'Jan 17 2000 15:05:00'
> AND w.referrer_url = r.referrer );

I believe you can do

DELETE FROM webhit_referer_raw
WHERE referrer_url = referrer_data.referrer
AND referrer_data.stat_date < 'Jan 17 2000 15:05:00';

(I assume stat_date is in referrer_data, otherwise this'd be easy.)

This is an example where Postgres' willingness to create implicit FROM
clause entries is a win ... AFAIK you couldn't do it in standard SQL,
since for some reason DELETE doesn't take a FROM clause.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Web Manager 2000-01-22 18:28:10 Repost: restore from dump problem - query buffer full
Previous Message Mark Stosberg 2000-01-22 18:06:39 geo_distance radius question