Re: array concat, et al patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: array concat, et al patch
Date: 2003-08-19 06:07:51
Message-ID: 20902.1061273271@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-patches

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Here's a patch for the documentation updates. Please apply.

Applied with one small change --- I thought the last example failed
to make the point that the elements of an ARRAY[] construct could be
dissimilar.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-08-19 06:10:11 Re: Why lower's not accept an AS declaration ?
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2003-08-19 05:52:45 Re: Why lower's not accept an AS declaration ?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trond Endrestøl 2003-08-20 19:49:23 New translation: Norwegian translation of PostgreSQL 7.3
Previous Message Joe Conway 2003-08-19 05:32:21 Re: array concat, et al patch