Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Takayuki Tsunakawa <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Patrick Earl <patearl(at)patearl(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.
Date: 2007-01-16 16:11:59
Message-ID: 20880.1168963919@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> And actually, when I look at the API docs, our case now seems to be
> documented. Or am I misreading our situation. I have:

> "If you call CreateFile on a file that is pending deletion as a result
> of a previous call to DeleteFile, the function fails. The operating
> system delays file deletion until all handles to the file are closed.
> GetLastError returns ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED."

We are not calling CreateFile ... we're just trying to open the thing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-01-16 16:16:06 Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2007-01-16 15:45:41 Re: Mounting a data dir read only

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-16 16:13:56 Re: Function execution costs 'n all that
Previous Message Darcy Buskermolen 2007-01-16 15:30:41 Re: Autovacuum improvements