Re: int2vector and btree indexes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: int2vector and btree indexes
Date: 2016-10-12 18:55:02
Message-ID: 20856.1476298502@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> On 2016/10/11 21:40, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm ... I kind of wonder why we have int2vectoreq or hashint2vector at
>> all, likewise the hash opclass based on them.

> Agreed. So how about the attached patch to remove the said infrastructure?

Looks good, pushed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-10-12 18:55:26 Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
Previous Message Greg Stark 2016-10-12 18:54:18 Re: pg_dump getBlobs query broken for 7.3 servers