| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
| Date: | 2010-04-27 17:52:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20854.1272390770@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> v3 attached
This patch changes KnownAssignedXidsRemove() so that failure to find
the target XID is elog(ERROR) (ie, a PANIC, since this is in the
startup process). However, this comment is still there:
/*
* We can fail to find an xid if the xid came from a subtransaction that
* aborts, though the xid hadn't yet been reported and no WAL records have
* been written using the subxid. In that case the abort record will
* contain that subxid and we haven't seen it before.
*/
WTF? Either the comment is wrong or this should not be an elog
condition.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-27 18:13:33 | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-04-27 17:18:28 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct |