Re: 7.4 include file conflict

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, aspeitia(at)sells(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.4 include file conflict
Date: 2003-12-16 14:12:16
Message-ID: 20853.1071583936@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Well, it is not really an ecpg file, but one needed for compatibility.
> And, yes, Peter is correct, this file may be included directly by some
> apps.

I was under the impression that this issue had already been resolved
among you, Lamar, and the Red Hat packaging people. Aren't we going to
install ecpg's headers into $(includedir)/ecpg instead of $(includedir)?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-12-16 14:47:45 Re: [HACKERS] 7.4.1 release notes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-12-16 14:01:33 Re: fork/exec patch