Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1
Date: 2016-11-07 15:29:15
Message-ID: 20824.1478532555@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm inclined to give this up as a bad job and go back to the
>> previous state. We have a solution that works and doesn't
>> produce warnings; third-party authors who don't want to use it
>> are on their own.

> I think you are right.

Done. We can always un-undo it if somebody has another idea.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2016-11-07 15:34:21 Re: Let's get rid of SPI_push/SPI_pop
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2016-11-07 15:25:24 Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.