Re: Fractal tree indexing

From: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fractal tree indexing
Date: 2013-02-13 15:49:26
Message-ID: 208237F6-1AF2-48EE-88E1-7E5C0FF47B54@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sent from my iPad

On 13-Feb-2013, at 20:30, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>
> First explain why you couldn't build it as an opclass for gist or
> spgist ...
>
>

That needs thinking about a bit.I was confused about the current indexes because they all build on BTrees.But, building an opclass with GiST should be a good solution.

Atri

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2013-02-13 15:50:44 Re: JSON Function Bike Shedding
Previous Message Kohei KaiGai 2013-02-13 15:27:35 Re: [sepgsql 2/3] Add db_schema:search permission checks