Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> It might be a good idea to rename BM_FREE to something else, perhaps
>> BM_UNPINNED, since I can recall being confused about what it meant
>> too.
> If all it indicates is refcount == 0, ISTM we can just get rid of it
> altogether, and just check the shared refcount directly.
Good point.
regards, tom lane