Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?
Date: 2016-04-29 02:07:40
Message-ID: 20799.1461895660@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Are we going to rename pg_xlog or pg_clog for 9.6?

NO. We don't even have a patch for this, much less one that's been
through any review. This suggestion is at least two months too late.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2016-04-29 02:09:07 Re: Postgres 9.6 scariest patch tournament
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-04-29 02:06:27 Re: [sqlsmith] Crash in apply_projection_to_path