"Dickson S. Guedes" <listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net> writes:
> Shouldn't the JDBC driver use another query instead that, since docs
> alerts[1] to this problem?
What's the default value being used for anyway? If it's to determine
which sequence is associated with the column, I think you shouldn't be
looking at pg_attrdef at all; you should look for a dependent sequence
via pg_depend. But maybe it's only being used to check if the column
has a default, in which case the possible staleness of the string
value isn't important.
regards, tom lane