Re: timestamp datatype cleanup

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Warren Turkal" <turkal(at)google(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timestamp datatype cleanup
Date: 2008-03-19 02:49:10
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Warren Turkal" <turkal(at)google(dot)com> writes:
> Give the discussion on this. Is this small patch being considered for
> inclusion? If not, what do I need to change to make it acceptable?

It's in the to-do queue for the current commit fest. The queue is kinda
long however :-(

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-19 03:03:55 Re: count(*) performance improvement ideas
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-19 02:46:01 Re: Re: pgsql: Add URLs for : * Speed WAL recovery by allowing more than one