Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Maybe your idea of allowing arbitrary GUCs is not a bad one, something
> like
> %{search_path}G
> (where we add a letter at the end just so we can add other things in the
> future that aren't GUCs.)
I'm pretty uncomfortable about the amount of code that could potentially
be reached during an error logging attempt if we do that.
regards, tom lane