From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] which list? |
Date: | 1999-06-01 05:51:51 |
Message-ID: | 20684.928216311@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> writes:
>> For example:
>> $ cvs log pgtransdb.cc | more
> Using cvsup that doesn't work very well.
Hmm ... I've got to think you've got cvsup misconfigured somehow.
It works great for me with a plain cvs setup. cvs log and similar
operations have to contact hub.org to work, but that's no big
problem for me. I believe the advantage of cvsup is that you have
all the same info stored locally, which is cool if you don't mind
expending the disk space. So it *should* Just Work.
If there's some critical bit of configuration info that's missing
from the new Postgres docs about CVS (doc/src/sgml/cvs.sgml),
please let Thomas know when you figure it out...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Theo Kramer | 1999-06-01 06:41:53 | Re: [HACKERS] please? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-06-01 04:51:55 | Re: [HACKERS] History of PostgreSQL |