Re: [HACKERS] which list?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] which list?
Date: 1999-06-01 05:51:51
Message-ID: 20684.928216311@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> writes:
>> For example:
>> $ cvs log pgtransdb.cc | more

> Using cvsup that doesn't work very well.

Hmm ... I've got to think you've got cvsup misconfigured somehow.
It works great for me with a plain cvs setup. cvs log and similar
operations have to contact hub.org to work, but that's no big
problem for me. I believe the advantage of cvsup is that you have
all the same info stored locally, which is cool if you don't mind
expending the disk space. So it *should* Just Work.

If there's some critical bit of configuration info that's missing
from the new Postgres docs about CVS (doc/src/sgml/cvs.sgml),
please let Thomas know when you figure it out...

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Theo Kramer 1999-06-01 06:41:53 Re: [HACKERS] please?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-06-01 04:51:55 Re: [HACKERS] History of PostgreSQL