BTW, datetime is busted in REL6_4 branch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: BTW, datetime is busted in REL6_4 branch
Date: 1999-02-25 01:50:34
Message-ID: 20666.919907434@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas,

It looks like you committed some fixes in datetime.c and dt.c to the
REL6_4 branch without committing changes in dt.h that they depend on...
they do not compile right now :-(.

I got my copy to build by un-ifdefing a couple of things, but I assume
that's not the intended answer so I won't commit it.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-02-25 01:57:50 RE: [HACKERS] copyObject() ?
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-02-25 01:42:04 Re: [HACKERS] large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1)