From: | "Mario Gonzalez" <gonzalemario(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Guillaume LELARGE" <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: French PDF manual |
Date: | 2006-05-08 19:47:44 |
Message-ID: | 2065a6cf0605081247l47ec3860q4e4d24ef97c8926@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 08/05/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Well, you can go into the documentation source directory and type 'make
> >> postgres.xml' to get an XML formatted DocBook file automatically.
> >>
> >> It has occasionally been suggested to convert the source of the
> >> documentation to XML, but while I'm not opposed to that, I don't see
> >> any specific advantages coming from such a move.
>
> > It would allow us to use xml2po to maintain translations, for one.
>
> Sounds like you can use that today, if you want to; it's just one extra
> step. But would it really be helpful on the documentation? I see where
> .po works for a lot of short, independent error messages, but I don't
> see it being real useful for big manuscripts.
>
Hello! my name is Mario and I've been working in that. For learning
purposes I'm writing the FAQ in a xml document. And, like Alvaro said,
«it would allow us to use xml2po»
So, what can we use for big documents instead?
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume LELARGE | 2006-05-08 22:10:15 | Re: French PDF manual |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-08 18:03:02 | Re: French PDF manual |