From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Potentially misleading name of libpq pass phrase hook |
Date: | 2020-05-16 00:21:50 |
Message-ID: | 20638.1589588510@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 3:03 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>> Since we haven't shipped this there is still time to rename, which IMO
>> is the right way forward. PQsslKeyPassHook_<library>_type would be one
>> option, but perhaps there are better alternatives?
> ISTM this should be renamed yeah -- and it should probably go on the open
> item lists, and with the schedule for the beta perhaps dealt with rather
> urgently?
+1. Once beta1 is out the cost to change the name goes up noticeably.
Not that we *couldn't* do it later, but it'd be better to have it be
right in beta1.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-05-16 01:15:47 | Re: pg_stat_wal_receiver and flushedUpto/writtenUpto |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-05-16 00:16:41 | Re: [PATCH] Fix pg_dump --no-tablespaces for the custom format |