Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "Petr Jelinek" <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
Date: 2006-07-16 19:17:33
Message-ID: 20627.1153077453@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>> In fact MS released Virtual PC 2004 for free a couple days ago
>> (http://www.microsoft.com/windows/virtualpc/default.mspx)

> Yeah - I have licences for it, but it's more of an interactive emulator. I think I'll need the server version to run fully unattended.

Surely we can dredge up enough Windows users that Dave need not futz
with putting multiple versions onto his one machine ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-07-16 19:33:33 Re: [PATCHES] Restartable Recovery
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-07-16 18:42:22 Re: [PATCHES] Restartable Recovery