| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Postgres Interfaces Mailing List <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: libpq on Windows (was [INTERFACES] psqlodbc) |
| Date: | 1998-08-02 17:00:20 |
| Message-ID: | 20616.902077220@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
"Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> btw, I've only just started looking at the fe/be code, but istm that it
> would be really nice if libpq-fe could fully support the WIN32 interface
> or if psqlodbc could use libpq-fe when on a Unix box.
I would like to see libpq-fe usable by applications running on Windows.
I am not in a position to test it for myself currently, but would gladly
coordinate any work needed.
The current sources are part of the way there --- they are alleged to
compile and work when WIN32 is defined. I am concerned about their
dependence on error printout to stderr, but I already posted a plan
of attack for that. Are there any other issues that need to be taken
care of?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Hartwig | 1998-08-02 17:08:47 | Re: [INTERFACES] psqlodbc |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Hansen | 1998-08-02 15:46:07 | What's the best X interface? |