Re: Sync ECPG scanner with core

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sync ECPG scanner with core
Date: 2018-11-13 19:01:45
Message-ID: 20593.1542135705@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2018-Nov-13, Tom Lane wrote:
>> More generally, I wonder if it'd be practical to make pgc.l backup-free
>> altogether. I'm not sure that the resulting gain in lexing speed would
>> really be of interest to anyone,

> Maybe time to compile the ecpg test cases during "make check-world"?

I'm dubious that the lexer is a significant part of that, though I could
be wrong ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-11-13 19:20:08 Minor fail in realfailN scanner rules
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-11-13 18:56:53 Re: Sync ECPG scanner with core