Re: Add Boolean node

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add Boolean node
Date: 2021-12-29 20:40:37
Message-ID: 2059105.1640810437@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> If we go around changing all these places, it might be worth to also change
> Integer to be a int64 instead of an int.

Meh ... that would have some non-obvious consequences, I think,
at least if you tried to make the grammar make use of the extra
width (it'd change the type resolution behavior for integer-ish
literals). I think it's better to keep it as plain int.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-12-29 20:48:30 Re: Add Boolean node
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-12-29 20:32:11 Re: Add Boolean node