From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add Boolean node |
Date: | 2021-12-29 20:40:37 |
Message-ID: | 2059105.1640810437@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> If we go around changing all these places, it might be worth to also change
> Integer to be a int64 instead of an int.
Meh ... that would have some non-obvious consequences, I think,
at least if you tried to make the grammar make use of the extra
width (it'd change the type resolution behavior for integer-ish
literals). I think it's better to keep it as plain int.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-12-29 20:48:30 | Re: Add Boolean node |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2021-12-29 20:32:11 | Re: Add Boolean node |