Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold <

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold <
Date: 2016-04-13 13:52:04
Message-ID: 20591.1460555524@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I have never understood why you didn't include 64-bit atomics in the
> original atomics implementation, and I really think we should have
> committed a patch to add them long before now.

What will you do on 32-bit platforms (or, more generally, anything
lacking 64-bit-wide atomics)?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-04-13 14:08:21 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold <
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-04-13 12:36:47 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold <

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-04-13 13:56:43 Re: Incomplete startup packet errors
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-04-13 13:50:09 Re: pg_upgrade documentation improvement patch