From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Makefile |
Date: | 2004-03-11 16:39:18 |
Message-ID: | 20588.1079023158@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-docs |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> The reason this is all so complicated in the first place is that in the
> past we wanted to defend ourselves against broken documentation sources
> when building snapshots. As of now this doesn't work anymore, so we
> might as well automate the whole process including the documentation
> build and be done with these games. Comments?
Making the man pages is still non-automatable, no? Folding the HTML
document build into "make dist" is probably reasonable, but I don't
see that it will make for any big gain in the reliability of the
process...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-03-12 00:25:44 | pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/syntax.sgml rc/backe ... |
Previous Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2004-03-11 15:49:08 | pgsql-server/src/bin/pg_dump/po sv.po |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Viktor Vislobokov | 2004-03-12 05:13:37 | Updated Russian translation of FAQ |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-03-11 15:03:45 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Makefile |