Re: 001_password.pl fails with --without-readline

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Soumya S Murali <soumyamurali(dot)work(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Oleg Tselebrovskiy <o(dot)tselebrovskiy(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 001_password.pl fails with --without-readline
Date: 2026-01-30 20:13:47
Message-ID: 2058491.1769804027@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Soumya S Murali <soumyamurali(dot)work(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I too agree that changing the behavior in a back-patch could be risky
> and it makes sense to leave that part out for now while still
> addressing the core test robustness issues. I will follow up once I
> have re-applied the patches and completed testing.

Since we're reaching the end of the January commitfest,
I went ahead and pushed these patches. There's still time to
revise them if your testing uncovers anything undesirable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-01-30 21:22:44 Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project
Previous Message Greg Burd 2026-01-30 20:11:39 Re: Refactor how we form HeapTuples for CatalogTuple(Insert|Update)