From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, PostgreSQL <Pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] *.sql contrib files contain unresolvable MODULE_PATHNAME |
Date: | 2011-10-12 18:29:17 |
Message-ID: | 20570.1318444157@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 19:36, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> PFA, a sample patch for this --- I've only bothered to change one script
>> file here, but will of course do the rest if there are no further
>> objections.
> I guess the failure scenario is if someone has an extension from 9.1.2
> and tries to load it into 9.1.1 or earlier, in which case they will
> get a syntax error or somehing when trying to run the CREATE EXTENSION
> command, right? I doubt that's something worth dealing with - it's a
> lot less likely to happen.
Hmm, yeah, you're right. But it doesn't seem like a big problem to me,
certainly not as big as the problem we're trying to solve.
> We might want to document this for other third-party extension
> developers to use as a trick as well?
Yes, I will add something to the docs.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-10-12 18:39:45 | Re: [BUGS] *.sql contrib files contain unresolvable MODULE_PATHNAME |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-10-12 18:21:11 | Re: [BUGS] *.sql contrib files contain unresolvable MODULE_PATHNAME |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Garick Hamlin | 2011-10-12 18:33:46 | Re: COUNT(*) and index-only scans |
Previous Message | Phil Sorber | 2011-10-12 18:27:51 | Re: patch: move dumpUserConfig call in dumpRoles function of pg_dumpall.c |