| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PREPARE, FK's and VIEWs |
| Date: | 2002-08-28 13:30:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20544.1030541419@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Now that we have prepared statements, should the foreign key code be changed
> to use them? I think it's highly likely that they will be reused in a
> connection. Might be an idea.
Waste of time; the FK code already does this for itself.
> Also, what if the person wants to prepare a view?
What does that mean? A view isn't preparable in isolation from the
query that's going to use it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-28 13:52:40 | Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-28 13:23:51 | Re: MemoryContextAlloc: invalid request size 1934906735 |