From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) |
Date: | 2018-08-21 17:29:20 |
Message-ID: | 20532.1534872560@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> So, does anyone with Windows build experience want to comment on this?
> The proposal is to desupport anything older than (probably) MSVC 2013,
> or alternatively anything that cannot compile the attached test file.
We've got a buildfarm handy that could answer the question.
Let's just stick a test function in there for a day and see
which animals fail.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-08-21 17:31:23 | Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) |
Previous Message | Alexandra Ryzhevich | 2018-08-21 16:48:49 | Re: [PATCH] Add regress test for pg_read_all_stats role |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-08-21 17:31:23 | Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) |
Previous Message | Umair Shahid | 2018-08-21 16:57:48 | Adding PGInstaller to the Downloads section |