Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Date: 2018-08-21 17:29:20
Message-ID: 20532.1534872560@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> So, does anyone with Windows build experience want to comment on this?
> The proposal is to desupport anything older than (probably) MSVC 2013,
> or alternatively anything that cannot compile the attached test file.

We've got a buildfarm handy that could answer the question.
Let's just stick a test function in there for a day and see
which animals fail.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-08-21 17:31:23 Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Previous Message Alexandra Ryzhevich 2018-08-21 16:48:49 Re: [PATCH] Add regress test for pg_read_all_stats role

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-08-21 17:31:23 Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Previous Message Umair Shahid 2018-08-21 16:57:48 Adding PGInstaller to the Downloads section