Re: 9.5: UPDATE/DELETE .. ORDER BY .. LIMIT ..

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rukh Meski <rukh(dot)meski(at)yahoo(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.5: UPDATE/DELETE .. ORDER BY .. LIMIT ..
Date: 2014-05-13 14:34:56
Message-ID: 20510.1399991696@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> How about sorting step, are you thinking to have MergeAppend
> node for it beneath ModifyTable?

Well yeah, that's pretty much the point.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-05-13 14:43:47 Re: pg_recvlogical, stdout and SIGHUP
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-05-13 14:13:53 Re: btree_gist valgrind warnings about uninitialized memory