| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mike Palmiotto <mike(dot)palmiotto(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql |
| Date: | 2017-04-05 16:26:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20506.1491409585@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> GCC generally doesn't warn about macro redefinitions, if both
> definitions are equivalent.
But they're *not* equivalent. c.h has
#define true ((bool) 1)
whereas so far as I can see the <stdbool.h> definition is just
#define true 1
And if you put those two definitions together you will get a warning.
The lack of one with c.h + <stdbool.h> means somebody is cheating.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-04-05 16:26:49 | Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-04-05 16:23:02 | Re: PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY? |