"Vadim Mikheev" <vmikheev(at)reveredata(dot)com> writes:
>> Given all the flak we got about WAL growth during the time we had that
>> code enabled, I think there's no chance that UNDO will be the preferred
>> path. It's not workable with big transactions.
> Somehow it's working in other DB systems.
Isn't limited UNDO segment size one of the most-hated management
problems for Oracle databases? I don't see why we should want to
duplicate one of their worst problems.
regards, tom lane