Re: Patch for pl/tcl Tcl_ExternalToUtf and Tcl_UtfToExternal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, seva(at)sevasoft(dot)kiev(dot)ua, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for pl/tcl Tcl_ExternalToUtf and Tcl_UtfToExternal
Date: 2001-09-04 02:07:14
Message-ID: 20427.999569234@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Peter wrote:
>> If Tcl decided to move to Unicode, we should follow.

> Your point about overhead is a good one, so I retract the gripe about
> using a configure switch. But please include documentation patches to
> describe the configure option in the administrator's guide (installation
> section).

> I agree with Tom here.

But Peter's point is a strong one as well. Does anyone else have an
opinion about this?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-09-04 02:10:44 Re: Patch for pl/tcl Tcl_ExternalToUtf and
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2001-09-04 01:11:40 Re: Read transactions don't work on 7.0.x db's