Re: pg_dump sort order for functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump sort order for functions
Date: 2010-01-11 15:44:52
Message-ID: 2041.1263224692@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> pg_dump sorts its output first by object type, then by object name, and
> then processes all that for dependencies. This works well, but for
> overloaded functions this still gives a random sort order that can
> produce annoying diffs in the dump.

> Would it be acceptable to introduce a secondary sort key field into the
> DumpableObject struct that functions would fill with, say, the argument
> types (maybe something like "text,int,int" -- need to play with this a
> little)?

I think you could probably use the existing tag field; no need for a new
one. The real problem is that an object-type-specific sort rule is a
bit klugy. IIRC there is discussion of this in the archives already ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-01-11 16:57:49 Re: pg_dump sort order for functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-11 15:32:32 Re: pg.dropped