| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | c(dot)bhuvan(at)iitg(dot)ac(dot)in, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: first_value()/nth_value() with IGNORE NULLS loop forever (EXCLUDE GROUP/TIES, frame past partition end, no ORDER BY) |
| Date: | 2026-11-04 07:44:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20261104.164415.1303787863463904189.ishii@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi Shihao,
> Hi Bhuvan,
>
> Thanks for the report and the patch. I can reproduce all five queries
> on master and on 19rc1.
>
> This came in with 25a30bbd423. I think it belongs on the 19 open items.
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_19_Open_Items
Yeah, I have just added this to the 19 open items.
> With your patch all five return at once and the regression tests
> pass. I also compared the three functions against array_agg(x) FILTER
> (WHERE x IS NOT NULL) over about 11k frame combinations. That included
> spill to disk and volatile arguments. No differences.
>
> One suggestion for the test. Could you add last_value IGNORE NULLS
> with EXCLUDE TIES and no ORDER BY? It scans backward, so it would
> catch a later fix in row_is_in_frame that returns -1 for every
> position after the current row.
I have just started to read the discussion and patches. Just to
clarify, is the test for feature improvement of row_is_in_frame?
Regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Guo | 2026-11-04 07:47:57 | Re: Incorrect NOT IN results with implicit casts returning NULL after anti-join optimization |
| Previous Message | shihao zhong | 2026-11-04 05:42:55 | Re: BUG #19780: gtsvector_picksplit() reads uninitialized data when called with three entries |