| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: tid_blockno() and tid_offset() accessor functions |
| Date: | 2026-04-05 19:44:48 |
| Message-ID: | 202604051942.hm4eg3s7fzcs@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
On 2026-Apr-05, Andres Freund wrote:
> I was reminded of this thread while in the process of doing some performance
> validation that required getting all the block numbers from an index scan,
> which required me to remember (ctid::text::point)[0], which I find to be very
> ugly.
Thanks for this patch! I agree that the statu quo was sort of embarrasing :-)
Regards
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2026-04-05 19:58:52 | Re: Better shared data structure management and resizable shared data structures |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2026-04-05 19:40:48 | Re: Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan reports per-worker stats in EXPLAIN ANALYZE |