Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?
Date: 2026-04-03 00:06:40
Message-ID: 20260403.090640.487260902102768591.ishii@postgresql.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas,

It seems there's remaining "Mule internal" in
doc/src/sgml/charset.sgml in your patch.

<para>
The character set support in <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
allows you to store text in a variety of character sets (also called
encodings), including
single-byte character sets such as the ISO 8859 series and
multiple-byte character sets such as <acronym>EUC</acronym> (Extended Unix
Code), UTF-8, and Mule internal code. All supported character sets
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2026-04-03 00:07:40 Re: pg_waldump: support decoding of WAL inside tarfile
Previous Message surya poondla 2026-04-02 23:51:09 Re: heapam_tuple_complete_speculative : remove unnecessary tuple fetch