Re: table AM option passing

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: table AM option passing
Date: 2026-03-30 12:08:45
Message-ID: 202603301206.adis56q72squ@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

I just pushed the part of 0001 that modifies the API of table_insert and
its sibling functions. So here 0001 adds the options bitmask to
table_update and table_delete, which is important for REPACK; and 0002
is identical as before and makes the interface (IMO) a bit more
future-proof.

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Every machine is a smoke machine if you operate it wrong enough."
https://twitter.com/libseybieda/status/1541673325781196801

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-give-options-bitmask-to-table_delete-table_update.patch text/x-diff 10.2 KB
v3-0002-Define-heap_insert-to-obey-tableam.h-option-bits-.patch text/x-diff 8.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yasuo Honda 2026-03-30 12:17:44 Re: [PATCH] Fix unexpected loss of DEFERRABLE property after toggling NOT ENFORCED / ENFORCED
Previous Message John Naylor 2026-03-30 12:01:02 Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations